By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Gun GravyGun GravyGun Gravy
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Firearms
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Reading: Federal Court Drives a Stake Through New York’s “Vampire Rule,” But Won’t Touch the Park Ban
Share
Font ResizerAa
Gun GravyGun Gravy
  • Latest News
  • Firearms
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Firearms
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Gun Gravy > Latest News > Federal Court Drives a Stake Through New York’s “Vampire Rule,” But Won’t Touch the Park Ban
Federal Court Drives a Stake Through New York’s “Vampire Rule,” But Won’t Touch the Park Ban
Latest News

Federal Court Drives a Stake Through New York’s “Vampire Rule,” But Won’t Touch the Park Ban

Jim Flanders
Last updated: May 20, 2026 2:38 pm
Jim Flanders Published May 20, 2026
Share
SHARE

Key Takeaways

  • A federal appeals court struck down New York’s ‘Private Property Provision,’ banning carry on open public property without owner consent.
  • The court ruled this provision unconstitutional, stating it does not align with historical firearm regulations.
  • However, the court upheld the ‘Public Parks Provision,’ affirming regulations against firearms in urban parks as constitutional.
  • FPC celebrated the decision but indicated the fight against public park carry bans continues.
  • Carry rules in New York remain complex; individuals should stay informed about current regulations before carrying.

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

NEW YORK, NY — A federal appeals court just struck down one of New York’s most aggressive post-Bruen carry restrictions, handing a major win to the Firearms Policy Coalition. But the same ruling left another gun ban standing, and both halves matter.

On May 18, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its decision in Christian v. James, an FPC case brought alongside FPC member Brett Christian and the Second Amendment Foundation. The court affirmed a permanent injunction against New York’s “Private Property Provision,” the rule critics call the “vampire rule.”

That provision flipped the normal default on its head. It made carrying a firearm a felony on any private property open to the public unless the owner posted clear signage allowing guns or gave express consent. In plain terms, a licensed New Yorker could be charged with a class E felony for walking into a grocery store, a gas station, or a pharmacy, simply because the owner had not affirmatively opted in. Carry was banned everywhere by default.

Judge Joseph Bianco wrote for the majority, holding the provision unconstitutional as applied to property open to the public because the State could not show it fits within the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation, the test Bruen requires.

The State threw ten historical statutes at the court. The panel rejected every one. Most of the colonial and founding-era laws targeted unlicensed hunting on private farms, not gun violence on property open to the public. That left New York leaning on an 1865 Louisiana law and a near-identical 1866 Texas law. Here is where the ruling gets pointed. The State itself conceded these were, in its own words, often enacted by racist legislatures and codified prejudices that existed at the time. The court refused to treat racially motivated, selectively enforced laws as a legitimate historical analogue.

The majority also nailed the real-world effect. Because most owners never bother to post signs, a rule like this effectively bans carry on nearly all private property, leaving the right meaningless for anyone who actually plans to enter a store.

Now the other half. The same panel upheld New York’s “Public Parks Provision,” rejecting the plaintiffs’ facial challenge. The State assembled more than sixty regulations from across more than twenty states, spanning roughly 1858 to the early 1900s, that banned firearms in urban parks. Starting with Central Park in 1858, the majority found a long, unbroken tradition and concluded the provision is constitutional at least as applied to urban parks. The court declined to rule on rural parks, since the plaintiffs raised that argument too late.

More from USA Carry:

Judge Steven Menashi concurred in part and dissented in part. He agreed the vampire rule is unconstitutional and would have gone further, but he broke with the majority on parks. The founding generation knew public parks like Boston Common and did not ban carry in them, he argued, and the understanding of the right in 1791 should govern, not a tradition that emerged in the late nineteenth century. As he put it, evidence of tradition unmoored from original meaning is not binding law.

FPC is celebrating the win while signaling the parks fight is not over. “The FPC Grassroots Army put a stake in the heart of New York’s ‘vampire rule’ carry ban today,” said FPC President Brandon Combs. “We’ll keep fighting in this and other cases to eliminate unconstitutional bans on carry in public parks so people can defend their lives in these public places.”

The case now heads back to the district court for a final order. The vampire rule is dead as to businesses open to the public. The park ban survives for now, and with the Supreme Court already weighing a nearly identical Hawaii law, this issue is far from settled.

If you carry in New York, do not get ahead of the law. The injunction covers private property open to the public, but the state’s other sensitive-location restrictions remain in force. Know the current rules before you carry anywhere.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

How Effective is an Assault Rifle?

Federal Judge Upholds Hawaii’s Ban on Gun and Ammo Sales to Adults Under 21, Citing an 1822 Case That Grouped Pistols With Liquor, Whips and Fiddles

Adults 18 and Older Can Now Carry Concealed Without a License in West Virginia Starting June 12

Tragedy At International Fountain: Three Dead, Four Wounded In Bite Of Seattle Crossfire

Las Vegas Bystanders Tackle Shooter After He Ambushed Ex-Girlfriend and Her New Husband Inside Smith’s

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We Recommend

Danger Close | Peter Bergen

JackCarrUSA JackCarrUSA September 12, 2026
Why is Full-auto Illegal?
Amazon Sells NOW – 10 ULTIMATE Home Defense Weapons!
Two Permits, Zero Recognition: Long-Haul Trucker Asks Supreme Court to Strike Down Minnesota’s Refusal to Honor His Florida and Georgia Carry Licenses
Third Circuit Rejects New Jersey’s ‘Catch-22’ and Revives NSSF Challenge to Gun Industry Liability Law After State Sued Glock
Daytime Home Invasion Halted As Armed Resident Defends Property
Tactical

CPI Doesn’t Matter – THIS Does

Jim Flanders Jim Flanders September 11, 2026
They Don’t Catch The Smart Ones | Active Self Protection
TacticalVideos

They Don’t Catch The Smart Ones | Active Self Protection

Active Self Protection Active Self Protection September 11, 2026
55 INSANE Camping Gadgets on Amazon That Feel Like CHEATING!
Videos

55 INSANE Camping Gadgets on Amazon That Feel Like CHEATING!

Survival Gear Survival Gear September 10, 2026
  • Videos
  • Tactical
  • Latest News
  • Firearms
2024 © Gun Gravy. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?