By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Gun GravyGun GravyGun Gravy
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Firearms
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Reading: Seven NJ Towns Remove $150 Concealed Carry Fee, Cutting Costs by 75%, With More Likely to Come
Share
Font ResizerAa
Gun GravyGun Gravy
  • Latest News
  • Firearms
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Firearms
  • Tactical
  • Videos
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
Gun Gravy > Latest News > Seven NJ Towns Remove $150 Concealed Carry Fee, Cutting Costs by 75%, With More Likely to Come
Seven NJ Towns Remove 0 Concealed Carry Fee, Cutting Costs by 75%, With More Likely to Come
Latest News

Seven NJ Towns Remove $150 Concealed Carry Fee, Cutting Costs by 75%, With More Likely to Come

Jim Flanders
Last updated: September 30, 2025 6:59 pm
Jim Flanders Published September 30, 2025
Share
SHARE

NEW JERSEY — A growing number of municipalities across New Jersey are taking steps to eliminate or refund the $150 local fee tied to the state’s $200 permit-to-carry (PTC) handgun application cost. What began in Englishtown has now expanded to at least seven towns, with more municipalities considering similar action. This trend is lowering the cost of carry permits for residents and challenging what many describe as an unconstitutional tax on a constitutional right.

How the State Fee Works

Under New Jersey law (N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4), residents applying for a permit to carry must pay $200. Of this, $50 is sent to the Superintendent of the State Police, while the remaining $150 is directed to the municipality where the application is filed. Critics argue that the municipal share is not a simple processing fee but a financial burden placed on citizens exercising their Second Amendment rights.

Towns That Have Acted

According to coverage from News2A, Bearing Arms, and local ordinances, the following towns have acted:

  • June 2025: Englishtown (Monmouth County) was the first to pass a rebate measure, followed by Franklin Borough (Sussex County).
  • July 2025: Dumont (Bergen County) approved refunds of the municipal portion, and Hopatcong (Sussex County) soon joined the initiative.
  • August 2025: Vernon Township (Sussex County) passed its rebate resolution on August 11, and Butler (Morris County) approved its ordinance on August 18. Old Tappan, however, voted down a similar proposal.
  • September 2025: Cresskill (Bergen County) became the seventh town to waive the $150 fee and issue refunds.

Some municipalities, such as Old Tappan, have considered but rejected similar measures, underscoring the political debate over the issue.

Why These Ordinances Matter

Many towns explicitly recognize Supreme Court precedent that governments cannot impose taxes on fundamental rights. By characterizing the $150 municipal charge as excessive and unconstitutional, they are taking local action to ease the financial burden on residents. In towns that rebate the fee, residents’ cost to apply for a carry permit drops from $200 to just $50, covering only the state’s portion. That represents a 75% savings for applicants in those municipalities. This is not only a financial win for applicants but also a symbolic stand: local leaders are asserting that exercising a constitutional right should not require paying what amounts to a tax.

National and Local Support

The movement has gained momentum through coordinated support from the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA), the New Jersey Firearms Owners Syndicate (NJFOS), and the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA). These groups have partnered to encourage municipalities across New Jersey to follow suit, and reports suggest dozens more towns may take up similar resolutions in the coming months.

What Comes Next

With momentum building, more New Jersey municipalities are expected to consider rebate or waiver ordinances in the months ahead. While the state law remains in place, local actions are sending a clear message: New Jersey residents are pushing back against what they view as excessive costs imposed on their right to bear arms.

Read the full article here

You Might Also Like

Beloved millionaire Maine philanthropist shot dead in ritzy DC suburb assisted living home, no arrests made

Alabama shooting suspect walks free on $60K bond as community demands he stay locked up

Virginia top cop hopeful torched by police organization over ‘reckless’ remarks about officer deaths

HHS freezes Minnesota child care payments over alleged daycare fraud scheme

Brown, MIT shootings may have stemmed from suspect’s failures, fixation on scientist’s success: report

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We Recommend
Carjackers Eat Lead From Prepared Bodyguards
TacticalVideos

Carjackers Eat Lead From Prepared Bodyguards

Active Self Protection Active Self Protection March 15, 2026
Am I A Hypocrite?
Home Intruder Dead After Warning From Homeowner: “I’m Armed”
Pajaro Family Fights Back: Intruder Subdued After Entering Young Girls’ Bedroom, Exposing Himself
67 Legal But LETHAL Home Defense Gadgets on Amazon 2026
Armed Guardian Program for Florida Colleges Heads to Gov. Ron DeSantis After Legislative Approval
Tactical Lever Gun? 🤯 #shorts #tactics #military #fun
Videos

Tactical Lever Gun? 🤯 #shorts #tactics #military #fun

Tactical Rifleman Tactical Rifleman March 14, 2026
Thanks To The War In Iran, A Moment Of Reckoning Has Arrived For The Entire Global Economy
Tactical

Thanks To The War In Iran, A Moment Of Reckoning Has Arrived For The Entire Global Economy

Jim Flanders Jim Flanders March 14, 2026
How to shoot better: breathe #tips #military
Videos

How to shoot better: breathe #tips #military

Tactical Rifleman Tactical Rifleman March 14, 2026
  • Latest News
  • Videos
  • Tactical
  • Firearms
2024 © Gun Gravy. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?